Thread:CEWinick/@comment-25620113-20190626121424/@comment-39063885-20190703174604

Sorry for not answering this question sooner, I was not aware of my message board. At the time, I only went for Kuro's video as a counter-argument only becuase his research and evidence did brought some serious questions that were not answered in the episode, such as Ben's FailSafe reaction from the Big Bang. I did thought of changing the review one last time when the DBC Q&A did help answer those concerns from the episode since Liam's came prepared and tried his best to not become biased in the best way; however, I realized to just keep it the same due to the episode itself not mentioning those important questions in the first place. Not only that, but the tedious fan war based on that episode alone was getting too toxic for me to be disgusted. Kuro's second video did bring his opinion about the series and the reaction from the DBC episode with solid points on why animation is important, but I felt it became too biased in the end.

My point is, the episode itself failed in truly completing the research, and the reaction to the episode became too toxic for me to care anymore. I understand why made me feel biased because of how I downplayed the episode, but I look for the quality and accuracy of the episode itself rather than who I beblieve who should have won. Yet, I take the research seriously from the series as the episode itself always depends on the research and detail to delcare the winner. This episode did well in the writing and animation, but the research was not complete where it left holes in their reasoning.

I hope this reply explains my reasoning in the best way for you, as I felt at times my review felt too biased as well. I am sadly keeping my review as it is because I want to move on from the episode while improving my skills in critiquing for future episodes.