Talk:Ben 10 VS Green Lantern/@comment-39174455-20190526203406

As a long time casual death battle viewer, this is the first time I truly felt conflicted with the outcome, not because of the fact that lantern won, but because of HOW he won.

They mentioned in the conclusion that even alien x had little chance of defeating lantern. That is fine. It's their opinion. But why portray Hal's victory so poorly? More importantly, why have x use time control and then have Hal do the same? Certain battles like mario vs sonic 2018 and raven versus twilight sparkle has mentioned abilities that both combatants had but did not use because it would result in a stalemate, a counter, or either character potentially winning with ease. (I.e. Mario's stop watch could counter sonic's chaos control, raven and twilight had several spells that could one shot the other).

If Hal was capable of beating even x, why portray the fight with x dominating him? I know the fight is not what determines the victor, but I believe that there would have been much less backlash if the death battle crew just portrayed Hal beating x, whether it is possible or not. I was enjoying the battle right up to the final blow; there are so many errors with that. This is coming from someone that is a dc fan; I have never seen a single episode of Ben 10. But I still he was lowballed here. I know the death battle crew will not change their decision, but they still should have portrayed their research better. I hope i'm not being too harsh...