Talk:Metal Sonic VS Zero/@comment-11365739-20170731172152/@comment-11365739-20170830004423

Maybe you didn´t know about this, but in SA2, Shadow literally said that Sonic is, possibly, the ultimate live form, implying that Shadow was recognizing that Sonic is more powerful than him. Curious, isn´t it?



"Sonic, I think I know what que ultimate life form is...it might be you!"

...and sorry, the video has Spanish subs instead os English Subs. But, well, I guess it doesn´t matter.

Classic Super Sonic even was able to resist Time Eater´s attacks without losing his super form. I don´t think Knuckles is much stronger than the Time Eater. I think that, in the Megadrive era, Sega just had not thought to make Super Sonic so powerful.

I think you didn´t understand my point. According to Generations, Metal copies Sonic perfectly in everything. Defeat someone who is equal to you in physical abilities is a feat of skill and combat experience. Sonic defeated Metal, but that does not mean that Metal can´t copy Sonic perfectly (again, remember his profile in generations), it is just that Sonic has more combat experience than Metal. The same logic can be used on X and Zero

Metaphors? Those sentences stress too much that Super Sonic purified the negative feelings of Chaos. I do not think that's metaphorical

Sorry, but I still can´t agree about X and the diabolic light saber. It is a not-limit fallacy. Just because it is more effective against metal, it doesn´t mean that a light saber would kill every robot in the fiction. Is like saying that base Sonic would kill Overlord with one hit just because one of the main characteristics of base Sonic is that he can cut metal

Also, in that case, why Elpizo didn´t defeat easily Harpuia, Leviathan and Fefnir? Remember that they never shown durability against star-buster attacks, and even died because Omega exploted. If a light saber is really THAT effective against metal, Elpizo would be perfectly able to kill the guardians with no problem.