Board Thread:VS Debates/@comment-31270269-20170329020413/@comment-4450205-20170329033151

Round 1: Though Steve can lift like a champ, his durability and speed are rather lackluster compared to Mario, as a 22 meter fall will kill him and he can barely run more than 8 m/s. Mario has comparable strength, far better reactions through dodging lightning, more mobility due to his athleticism and jumping ability, and immensely more experience. Add that fact that Steve's punches don't really match his lifting power (dude takes a few seconds to break a cubic meter of wood while Mario can easily break brick in one punch) and you have one screwed Steve.

Round 2: While Steve's armor lets him negate over 90% of the damage he takes amd he has some versatile equipment that lets him create complex traps or negate durability, Mario still holds the superior stats and even equipment. Steve has a defense from some of Mario's power-ups like the fire flower and his regen lets him survive a while, but Steve has no defense against Starman's insta-kill and Mario still beats Steve in sheer versatility.

Round 3: White Tanooki Mario is strong as shit, but he has no ways to bypass Creative Steve's own invincibility while Steve's /kill command should do Mario in. Not to mention that Steve can destroy bedrock with one punch, a material infamous for being indestructible in survival, just like White Tanooki Mario is.

Overall, I prefer Mario as a character.

Minecraft's fanbase is primarily composed of the prime age for annoying kids on the internet, so I'll go with them.

Nay

None

It's alright, but Mario's picture should be raised a little higher.