Talk:Princess Peach/@comment-86.177.30.165-20140512153938/@comment-86.177.30.165-20140512172800

Your calling me immature for stating my opinion? Remember death battle aren't proven to be right all the time and a battle can't be decided fair and square by only a minority of character attacks. And I had to keep ranting because it seemed to be the only way I could actually get either of you to receive my messages without you denying it, saying I'm wrong or saying I was being mislead by my own fantasies. I didn't mean to come of rude that way. But it was frustrating. As somebody who has researched the topic of both damsels as much as I have and played every game of both franchises to be called wrong or deluded I was going to get frustrated with you. And to be honest I don't understand the logic of how in a battle between swords and bows and umbrellas and turnips peaches weapons are deemed better? And to be logical, aren't zeldas spells far more combat related than peaches magic? I mean while peach can heal and make fiery shields zeldas attacks are augmented with magic, she has fireballs, magic shields, sneaky teleportation, telekinesis and a magic bow. Logically I see zeldas arsenal to be more combat related than peaches. That's my opinion on it. And another thing is that peaches mega strike magically separates the ball in 3 it does not destroy it it turns it into 3 separate balls through magic. So when she used that kick on zelda, shouldn't zelda have been split into 3 zeldas not obliterated?