Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26449310-20170302032257/@comment-29605082-20170302122503

Brobuscus101 wrote:

CallMeKnuckles wrote:

Brobuscus101 wrote: >164 mph

>Completely ignores Mach 174 Shovel Knight Because that was totally their only reason. "There's no way that Shovel could've put him down very quickly"

What about the Alchemy Coin? What about cutting his head off? What about chopping him to bits?

CMK: Were you not listening to what they were saying? Scrooge can tank going through mine fields. Chopping him? Cutting his head off? Scrooge has faced off with knights and sword wielders on numerous occasions. And the Alchemy Coin? Scrooge has been transmulated before. Plus, he would likely be able to dodge it. And NO, he wouldn't fall for it. Like, your enemy just randomly slides a coin torwards you? Scrooge isn't dumb.

"Those that could buy him time could only last so long, due to his limited supply of magic."

This crap again? This downplayed Mega Man, now Shovel Knight gets it? Yes, he has a limited supply, but that doesn't mean he couldn't have a crapton of it anyway. Heck, he's got SO MANY of those things, that numbers wouldn't matter. One hit and bye bye, Scrooge McDuck.

CMK: Scrooge has more than enough weapons to counter such relics. And his weapons are unlimited.

"Shovel Knight hasn't faced anyone quite like Scrooge McDuck."

That's true. He's fought worse. Dragons, skeletons, the Enchantress, and even the Battletoads and KRATOS.

CMK: I don't think you understand what they mean by "anyone like Scrooge McDuck". They don't mean as powerful, they mean anyone with a similar arsenal as Scrooge, like the knights and magicians Scrooge has faced. Also, unrelated, but do you seriously think Scrooge isn't as tough as (and probably has defeated) random skeletons and dragons?

I'm not saying Scrooge doesn't win, but that's ridiculous