Talk:One Minute Melee/@comment-26579390-20160919153906/@comment-26964335-20160919164337

Because Akuma does not scale to Kenpachi at all, nor does he surpass him in overall power, in fact Kenpachi completely destroys Akuma with barely any effort, and don't get me wrong I love Akuma (I prefer him over Ryu and Ken), but in an actual fight Kenpachi wrecks him pretty badly.

This is why it needs to be an offical Death Battle (even though fans are getting sick of returning fighters), with proper research we would have had the correct outcome (granted as of right now Death Battle seems to hate SF so why not), not the biased outcome that OMM pulled 3 times in a row (which is one of the reasons why I perfer Death Battle and DBX over OMM, they actually get their results right 90% of the time), Akuma is not a god, he can be beaten and killed, in fact the more power Akuma puts out the more damage he takes in fights, OMM completely nerfed Kenpachi to bits so their favorite can win every time, if they have a boner for SF winning, then explain why Juri or Ryu didn't win their fights against their foes? (oh right...no research, even though Ryu tied with Jin.)

Kind of funny that DBX is far more accurate with their outcomes compared to OMM and they don't even use research as well (I wonder how many fights OMM got right? Because they got a ton of those fights wrong.)

Also Ichigo won his fight (against Sasuke no less, then again Sasuke's as hated as Silver is), so it kind of semi softens the blow a bit, but still it's freaking Kenpachi, one of the more popular Bleach characters and yet he loses to someone whom he clearly surpasses, because of bias.

I'll laugh if DBX decides to do their own version of Akuma vs Kenpachi (and it ends in a draw, which I'll be ok with).