Board Thread:VS Debates/@comment-31816534-20170606023747/@comment-26374068-20170705221004

TheMetallicBlur wrote: 1. He also didn't exactly beat them in hand-to-hand either.

2. Literally, Mario never flies like that ever again, Plus if that's the case, why does he need a launch star every other time?

3. I don't think you know about the Biolizard. The only way to harm it is to attack its life support system and i highly doubt Mario can do that.

4. The whole "Mario series has been around longer than the Sonic series, therefore Mario has more experience" is terrible logic. That's like saying Mario has more combat experience than some new guy that comes up even though his game says that he's fought for 10,000 years. Also, it's questionable if Mario fought as a kid or teen.

5. Wouldn't that suggest that Mario also has weak spots?

So, no Mario and Luigi don't destroy. Stats will only delay the inevitable. That's like saying Bowser is more evil than Eggman. Also, I feel like I'm in a 3 on 1 debate. Then again, this always happens when I debate Mario fans. 1. Still beat them.

2. He needed Luma to fly. I don't understand Dani's reasoning for bringing that up, because flight in those games require outside help. But anything else in Galaxy? Fair game. Including a feat that allows him to cross universes in ten seconds.

3. I'm pretty sure Mario would look at the life support system wrong and it'd blow up. Hell, watch Luigi death stare it, lol. Trying to lighten the mood a little here... a 5-B being cannot stand up to a 3-B one.

4. Questionable Mario fought as a teen? Hrrmmm... I just noticed some hypocrisy, mate. Didn't you say in another debate that it wasn't right to assume Super Sonic didn't fight during the time in Sonic Advance? Heh heh. Gotcha!

5. No. Read my other post.

And? Bring in some friends. Did we intend that? Nope. We're defending who we think wins. We're not teaming up on you, necessarily. Though, to get our points across, we might as well.