Talk:Wolverine VS Raiden/@comment-16919137-20150827180130

There's a logic I've been seeing lately (Not too terribly often) that's been kinda... Irritating me. Not often here, but in other debate forums.

The logic? That, if a character has flesh/muscles and no armor, they can be killed by average knives/bullets.

How am I gonna disprove this logic? Well, I'm gonna use Donkey Kong as the "character with flesh and muscles with no armor."

Donkey Kong's Country-level moon punch actually gives him Country Level durability, too, if we apply Newton's Third Law (Where each force has an equal but opposite reaction).

Would you really think that a normal knife or bullet would break his skin?

No, it wouldn't. That knife that an opponent is trying to stab any character with must have enough or superior destructive power to stab/shoot the character.

Again, using DK as an example, that knife must be wielded by someone who has similar or superior DC. Either that, or the knife itself must have superior DC (That would be kinda strange).

People, Jeff the Killer wouldn't beat He-Man because "lel knives lel he-man is protected by dem muscles", nor would Master Chief beat Mario because "lel bullets lel Malleo has no armor."