User blog comment:Timefreezer4/Time's New Q&A/@comment-32057984-20180222131253/@comment-4450205-20180224002944

I wouldn't say any episode has a "definitely" wrong verdict, per se. As we are dealing with fictional characters, there is bias and uncertainty in every single analysis for them, as different interpretations of character power exists. Thus, I treat verdicts as opinions, because they cannot be provable facts.

As for episodes I disagree with: Bowser VS Ganon, as Bowser's massivr stat and ability advantages lets him crush Ganon to goo even if he's "immortal" to all but holy weapons (if he can be damaged without regenerating by mundane weapons, he can be turned into goo incapable of fighting even if he's technically alive); Tracer VS Scout, as Scout's superior strength and arsenal combined with comparable mobility leaves Tracer at a huge disadvantage; Thor VS Wonder Woman, as Diana's greatest strength feat on there is unreliable and there is no other evidence she is stronger while Thor's superior powers and durability gives him multiple methods of taking Diana down while she really only has her sword as a reliable method (also the God Blast was omitted from the analysis, which would oneshot Diana if it landed); Wolverine VS Raiden, as Murasama, despite being capable of cutting Adamantium, isn't powerful enough to do so in a reasonable amount of time, combined with the fact that Raiden has to specifically decapitate Wolvie, which Jack wouldn't know or concentrate on doing, while Logan can oneshot the cyborg at any point in the fight. There are others, but here's a small list.