Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26510892-20160929001858/@comment-26221704-20160929042403

Stop fucking quoting each other holy shit guys. Just use @Username for quicker replies.

I find it sad that criticisms can be called "attacks" or that we have the need to call criticisms against a person a "non-attack". Nothing OP orginially states is false or meant to be hurtful. None of the admins are bad people, taking the idea of improvement as an attack or insult is something I find strange. Naturally, if I were to get criticism concerning my position of power on the DBF wiki I'll accept it instead of making up excuses or just not even responding.

If you're personally offended because personal problems get in the way then as simple as it can be said, being an admin isn't right for you. This isn't an attack either, it's just plain and simple fact. If you can't handle pressure or fixing problems properly by yourself on a consistent basis then for what reason should you be given a position of power? There's nothing wrong with you trying to be a good admin either, I'm sure we all appreciate it. However, the fact that you can't handle that means you're likely not qualified for the position in the first place.

No one's asking you to be perfect or to completely change who you are, what anyone would be asking is to try to improve at doing your job. As for what punishments people should get, that's what rules and guidelines are for. It would be a good idea to organized the penalties for disregarding rules and specifying certain rules instead of just giving a random ban time on the act of shitposting.

From what I can tell, this thread lost it's original purpose at a few points, if you're going to discuss this please just stay on topic at hand: admin improvement, not "attack on admin" or anything similar.

I'm not even going to touch the Joker and Gmea thing since that seems to have died down, thank the Lord.