Thread:ZeedMillenniummon89/@comment-25620113-20170911055910

I'm just moving this argument to your wall so that we don't clutter up the comment section with our argument.

OK. Because WOG statements tend to be contradictory. Take Ben 10 for example. One of the writers said the planet Primus was destroyed in episode 6 of Omniverse while another one said nothing was concrete until it was addressed in the show. From a VS debates standpoint this can be problematic. That same writer would go on to say Atomix is Ben's second most powerful alien only behind Alien X yet feats from the show contradict this. He specifically said Atomix was more powerful than Way Big yet Way Big has shown to have FTL+ reactions and was effortlessly able to overpower a planet destroying beam. Atomix on the overhand lost to someone who only had Island level feats and that is his BEST feat. I believe Vs Battles wiki still has Atomix at Dwarf Planet because of this despite never showing any feat of the sort and LOSING to an opponent who had only displayed Island level feats.

Now I'm not saying WOG statements or character statements should be abolished but they must be used with caution. That Mundus feat was nowhere near universe until Kamiya said it was. Atomix isn't anywhere near Ben's second most powerful alien especially when we see him have two aliens that have displayed universal feats through abilities or otherwise and three other aliens that have displayed planet level feats.

Of course WOG statements are important but on the other hand its important to not just rely on them and see if they contradict with the source material.  