Talk:The Meta VS Agent Carolina/@comment-26451616-20160727000451/@comment-26221704-20160727155751

I find it funny how some of you complaining are mad about it being "inaccurate", okay but when did we ever claim to be 100% accurate? Then we get the "oh they got it wrong" well have you ever considered the other view? "oh its close" maybe because it is? Most of these complaints seem close-minded and have no real substance other than "they hurt my view and opinions on certain outcomes therefore they're all wrong and jerks". This is nothing more than one of those "one or three fights are wrong so they're all wrong". Also don't compare us to DA, the wiki and DA are two different formats.

I'm not beefing anyone for hating the wiki, I'm getting beefed or rather "salty" the fact that just most of the complaints seem aimed more towards the content and more so outcomes of the battles than anything else. And those complaints just happen to be mainly "they got it wrong" boo fucking hoo cry me a river. The research complaint I can get, my fights and others have lacking research compared to DA bios for sure. If some of you are going to complain about reliance on VS Battles simply because you view them as wrong that's fine but don't get all worked up about it.

Basically while you all have your opinion and I respect them, some of the complaints here can simply be narrowed down to "oh they let my preferred character lose must mean they're wrong and didn't do research". Now I'm not saying for most scenarios that isn't right because there sure as hell are a shit ton of stupid fights on that wiki (I would know, even some of my own fights) where it's like that but you then seem to ignore good fights regardless if they get the result wrong. Unless none of you read the fights and just skip to the results to complain, if so then I've just wasted my time.