Board Thread:Fun and Games/@comment-27305742-20190618163425/@comment-4708902-20190727185827

MexicanJesus69 wrote: Godzillavkk wrote: Godzillavkk wrote: WBH-LM27 wrote: Godzillavkk wrote: MexicanJesus69 wrote: Godzillavkk wrote: Sonic: Well, I'm getting more and more apology letters about my upcoming movie, because people are seeing that Cats trailer. *Shudders Deadpool: Man that thing gives me shivers, they look so bad.

Ultron: As a full CGI-character, i cringed. Sonic: And people complain that the Lion King remake has no facial emotions. Well, if the WERE given human emotion in their faces, it would be in the same uncanny valley teritory as Cats. Deadpool: "Slow down there, Hedgeguy! It's already been proven that better facial animations would have made The Lion King remake wayy better. I am, of course, referring to Aslan in The Chronicles of Narnia. And comparing completely cgi animals to... whatever the fuck CATS does, is just giving Disney too much credit." Godzilla: I never show emotion in my face, and yet, people can read me, especially high functioning autistics. And even Aslan had limited facial expressions. Actions can show emotion just as easily, if not moreso than your face. Doctor Fate: Good point Godzilla. And my helmet means no one knows what I feel. It's also because one of the effects of the helm of fate, is removing all emotion from me, to prevent me from becoming emotionaly compromised. Deadpool: All this remembers me to that awful cgi character in "The Mummy". That scorpion-man looked so bad man. Fate: Well, it was the early 2000's.

Iron Man: Even practical effects can be bad.