Talk:Zelda VS Peach/@comment-25969827-20150620003416/@comment-27084160-20160401195959

While I do agree with the overall outcome of the video, in the fact that Peach is the far better fighter over Zelda in terms of actual combat and the Zelda fanbase overreacting/making stupid arguments I do think how the outcome was portrayed was poorly constructed in terms of logical facts. I like both Peach and Zelda as characters, so I obviously didn't care which one won or lost. But honeslty the MegaStrike isn't even an actual combat move, even the Mario Strikers charged mannuel states it isn't. It's exclusively used for that game and even then it does harm, but just stun the goalies. This also violates their 3rd rule in "combat moves are to be faithfully represented" which that goes against that. If it was to show Peach's athletic ability that also doesn't help in an argument favor considering Peach has other stuff in her arsenal that suggest this in an actual perfect representation.

The thing with Zelda is she's never shown to hardly do anything outside assisting Link in battle, therefore outside of that her lack of screentime does hurt what other abilities she could have, but is never shown. I also think using Smash canon was a bad idea since it makes a lot of things submitted within the battle either contradicting or favored. If Zelda were to be given a proper aresenal I think her CDI games would've been suitable for that because its at least a Zelda incarnation with more than one moveset. Also the "its not related" could've count because Smash is totally unrelated, even having the selected moves work differently to fit into Smash's rules and playstyle. Deathbattles are also about even footing with weaponry with the superior one being the victor in terms of some factors overpowering the other.

I have issues with the fight, none have to do with the overall outcome either.